This is the fourth blog post for HealthMatriX’s AI Learning and Awareness series.
AI has revolutionized various sectors, offering the latest automation, efficiency, and innovation opportunities. However, unlocking the full potential of an AI model relies on choosing the most suitable deployment option.
With a multitude of deployment models available, each with its advantages and limitations, selecting the optimal one can be a complex undertaking. This article serves as a comprehensive guide, equipping you with six crucial strategies to navigate the decision-making process and confidently choose an AI deployment option based on your specific needs. By following these key strategies, you’ll be well-equipped to make a confident choice that propels your AI project toward success.
The first step in determining an AI deployment option is thoroughly exploring the use case. This involves understanding your business’s unique requirements and objectives and the specific problem you are trying to solve with AI. By deeply understanding your use case, you can identify the most suitable AI solution that aligns with your business goals and objectives.
A well-established retail chain, having a substantial customer following, is looking to enhance its personalized advertising approach. Their goal is to harness the capabilities of TrackMatriX AI solutions to develop tailored and engaging advertisements that effectively connect with their customer base. While contemplating the utilization of GenAI technologies for crafting personalized in-app ads, they are exploring TrackMatriX AI solutions and have a few inquiries, including:
Moreover, the insights gained from analyzing a specific use case are invaluable, as they can be applied to other scenarios, thereby demonstrating the adaptability of the model for various applications. As the process continues, the most suitable deployment option may change based on evolving criteria, priorities, and insights obtained during the evaluation.
When determining an AI deployment option, it is crucial to analyze key direct cost drivers to generate an accurate cost estimate for various deployment options. The following factors should be considered:
Choose the foundational model on specific performance or features for customization that are necessary for your particular use case. Remember that this choice can significantly impact performance, customization, and cost. The choice of your Foundation model impacts the performance, cost, and customization of your AI model.
The pricing type for foundation models can be on-demand (pay per token) or provisioned throughput (pay per hour of use). On-demand is more flexible but it’s good for unpredictable usage, while provisioned throughput is cost-effective at scale but requires consistent, high-volume usage.
The level of customization needed for the use case will determine whether tuning the model is necessary. Tuning allows for model customization to better align with specific use-case requirements but most use cases won’t need training and prompt engineering is available, potentially increasing accuracy but also costs.
The choice to train the model from scratch or use pre-existing foundation models depends on the availability of relevant training data, expertise, and budget for training. Full training allows for highly customized models at a higher cost while choosing not to train is more cost-effective with quicker deployment.
The instance type chosen for custom deployments should be based on computational requirements and budget constraints. Instance type determines computational resources, affecting performance and cost.
The choice to embed data or not depends on whether the model requires additional data relationships for better performance. Embedding enhances performance but could increase complexity and costs.
Costs for data storage, vector databases, and data acquisition should be considered when training models from scratch or when large datasets are involved. These costs are directly tied to the scale of data used in model training and operation.
Determine tokens used per year for inference, embedding, fine-tuning, and returning based on use-case requirements and data processing needs. But don’t first it can impact budgeting and processing costs.
Determine based on the capacity of the foundation model and estimated TPM/RPM when utilizing Provisioned Throughput to ensure adequate capacity for handling transactions/requests. Provisioned throughput is the maximum amount of capacity that an AI application can consume from a table or index.
Calculate costs for required personnel for setup, run, integration, application setup, support, and testing depending on deployment complexity.
In addition to direct costs, it is essential to calculate indirect costs when determining an AI deployment option. Indirect costs include factors such as maintenance and support, which can significantly impact an AI solution’s total cost of ownership (TCO).
These 2 factors include:
To accurately determine an AI deployment option, it’s essential to identify and quantify potential benefits, including revenue increase and cost savings. This involves assessing the financial impact of the GenAI deployment on your organization, taking into account factors such as the baseline figure, revenue upside, and cost savings.
Hence, balancing potential gains with investment is key to choosing the most cost-effective AI deployment option. Also, the highly customizable and scalable options seem expensive upfront, but they can ultimately unlock greater revenue opportunities and cost reductions, making them a potentially smarter long-term investment.
Assessing business viability involves evaluating the return on investment (ROI) and other metrics to understand the financial impact of AI deployment. This step involves calculating the payback period for each deployment archetype and comparing the ROI across different options.
But how will it impact your deployment option? In simple words by understanding the ROI and payback period, you can select deployment options that are cost-effective and align with your budgetary constraints while delivering the desired benefits.
Also, the highly customizable and scalable options seem expensive upfront, but they can ultimately unlock greater revenue opportunities and cost reductions, making them a potentially smarter long-term investment.
When making a holistic decision on whether to deploy a GenAI solution, it is crucial to consider various tradeoffs and strategic factors beyond cost and benefit. These factors include:
By examining these strategic factors, you can make informed deployment decisions that align with your long-term organizational goals, ensuring a successful and beneficial GenAI implementation.
HealthMatriX is a comprehensive AI-enabled platform designed to provide advanced solutions for protecting the mission-critical and confidential data and products of the healthcare and life sciences sector for faster business outcomes.
The platform offers flexible deployment, scalable solutions, and consumption models. HealthMatriX also satisfies all the questions asked by managers when choosing an AI solution. To address any inquiries about our AI solutions, schedule a consultation with us.Tailored for healthcare and life sciences sector enterprise needs, HealthMatriX is built on the foundations of AI services from leading platforms such as AWS AI Services, ChatGPT, Claude.ai, Google Cloud AI Platform, Microsoft Azure AI Services, and IBM Cloud AI Services By providing AI prototyping services and AI solutions, HealthMatriX facilitates the realization of AI aspirations while ensuring robust governance, cybersecurity, and data protection.
The platform offers flexible deployment, scalable solutions, and consumption models. HealthMatriX also satisfies all the questions asked by managers when choosing an AI solution. To address any inquiries about our AI solutions, schedule a consultation with us.
HealthMatriX Technologies Limited provides AI-enabled anti-counterfeit QR codes, NFC/UHF tags, and cutting-edge technology development solutions to protect the products and documents for the healthcare and life science sectors. HealthMatriX also provides tamper-evident physical products, highly advanced AI-automated software integrations, and white-label solutions. Our cybersecure, data-protected, standardized, and innovative solutions help safeguard healthcare brands, products, solutions, and documents from unauthorized reproduction and duplication.
Read the fifth blog post for HealthMatriX’s AI Learning and Awareness series here.
© 2022 HealthMatriX Technologies Pte. Ltd. All rights reserved.
HealthMatriX provides AI-enabled anti-counterfeit QR codes, NFC/UHF tags, and cutting-edge technology development solutions to protect the products and documents for the health sector. HealthMatriX also provides tamper-evident physical products highly advanced AI-automated software integrations and white-label solutions.
© 2024 HealthMatriX Technologies. All rights reserved.
Cookie | Duration | Description |
---|---|---|
cookielawinfo-checbox-analytics | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics". |
cookielawinfo-checbox-functional | 11 months | The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional". |
cookielawinfo-checbox-others | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other. |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance". |
viewed_cookie_policy | 11 months | The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data. |